Thu Apr 24 2014   
 

College News

14th Annual Richard Grand Damages Argument Competition Award-Winners Announced Read more...

Posted: 04/21/2014

 

Conversations with Bob Mundheim Continues with John Cannon of Shearman & Sterling Read more...

Posted: 04/07/2014

 

Board of Regents Approves Reduction in Arizona Law Nonresident Tuition Read more...

Posted: 04/04/2014

 

Peter Mundheim & Brandon Becker Join Prof. Mundheim in the Conversation Series Read more...

Posted: 03/31/2014

 

Conversations with Bob Mundheim Start March 24, 2014 Read more...

Posted: 03/24/2014

 

Arizona Law Career Development Starts Interview Program in Phoenix Read more...

Posted: 03/14/2014

 

Arizona Law and Quarles & Brady Partner to Launch Intellectual Property & Entrepreneurship Clinic Read more...

Posted: 03/11/2014

 

UANews Features Prof. Anaya's Work as Teacher & International Human Rights Expert Read more...

Posted: 02/27/2014

 

Richard Grand Legal Writing Competition Rewards Excellence in Legal Writing Read more...

Posted: 02/17/2014

 

Prof Anaya Nominated for Nobel Peace Prize Read more...

Posted: 02/07/2014

 

Environmental Breakfast Club 2013 - 2014 Schedule Read more...

Posted: 09/11/2013

 

 

Arizona Law on TwitterArizona Law on Facebook Arizona Law on YouTube

Course Description

While collaboration, public participation, and openness in government have been themes of President Obamas administration, these concepts have long been core principles of our federal government. In particular, the Administrative Procedure Act and Freedom of Information Act guarantee the public a role in shaping federal agency policy and access to information about agency decision-making. Since passage of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in 1969 these concepts have been applied directly to environmental decision-making. Federal law and White House policy for several years have encouraged agencies to use alternative dispute resolution to address environmental conflicts, including by direct agency engagement of stakeholders. The primary law, the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996 provides confidentiality for dispute resolution communications, including an exemption from the Freedom of Information Act. These various laws and initiatives create conflicting values  openness, confidentiality, inclusiveness, public interest, and individual stakeholder interest.

The class uses a combination of discussion, exercises and role-playing to explore the interaction between these conflicting values and how to strike the appropriate balance, considering the legal framework and policy goals. The initial class sessions introduce the students to the relevant legal frame work, the issues confronting public resource managers, and examples of collaborative decision-making. Students are then introduced to a scenario concerning the management of a national forest and the need to balance a broad range of interests including ecosystem restoration, economic development, recreational use, tribal concerns, and local government. Students are assigned roles representing these interests, design a process for addressing the conflicting interests, and negotiate certain elements of a forest management plan. The class then compares what happened in the simulation with actual cases. At the conclusion of the course, students submit a 10-15 page paper evaluating the simulation by analyzing an issue such as how effectively the collaboration process balanced the tension between inclusiveness and practicality, or how the negotiation could have been changed to be more effective. Grading will be on a pass/fail basis.

 

Updated: 01/06/2014